The Invisible Hand: Why Peer Pressure is Japan’s Greatest Quality Control (and Worst Creativity Killer)

Many surveillance cameras and lights in one place, the iconic situation of surveillance societies
TOC

The famous joke: When everyone else has already jumped

On a ship with people from various countries, you’re the first to notice the ship is sinking. What’s the perfect phrase to make them jump into the water?

  • To Americans: “Jump, and you’ll be a hero!”
  • To the British: “A true gentleman/lady would jump.”
  • To the French: “Do not jump!”
  • To the Germans: “The regulations say we must jump.”
  • To the Japanese: “Everybody else has already jumped.”

This is a famous, and slightly painful, joke in Japan. It perfectly captures one of the most ingrained Japanese characteristics. In most schools, teachers tell us to behave the same as everybody else. At home, parents scold their kids, saying, “No one would do something like that!” (The only exception is when kids beg for the same things their friends have; then the parents inevitably respond, “Live and let live.”) Either way, we are raised under immense, constant peer pressure.

The COVID-19 experiment: Mutual monitoring in action

This pervasive pressure is a kind of embedded, decentralized control system. It’s like a soft version of George Orwell’s 1984, without the physical Big Brother.

To control the COVID-19 infection, many countries issued legally binding stay-at-home orders. Japan never imposed such legal restrictions, yet the number of infections remained surprisingly small. People outside Japan were curious about this “Japanese miracle.” The answer is simple: a mutual monitoring system driven by strong peer pressure.

Though there were no legal restrictions, shops and restaurants were harrassed to close during the peak period. The freedom to choose was exchanged for the pressure to conform. As the saying goes, the first casualty of war is freedom. In that sense, yes, the pandemic response was exactly a war—against freedom.

The double-edged sword: Quality vs. Creativity

Personally, I strongly dislike this kind of all-encompassing peer pressure embedded in Japanese society. But we must, on the other hand, acknowledge its immense advantage in one critical area: business and quality control.

This mutual monitoring system enables an exceptionally high level of quality control and meticulousness. This is why you can consistently count on the quality of Japanese products, even as Japan’s overall economic position has declined. You can see the consequences of this regime change in the global shift from giants like Japanese electronics and car manufacturers to new players like GAFA (Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon). We gained quality assurance, but we sacrificed the radical creativity needed to lead the next era.

The CondeHouse anomaly: An exception to the rule

For most companies operating under this system, people like me—who tend to question the consensus and hate being monitored—are difficult to manage.

Surprisingly enough, CondeHouse still keeps me around, allows me to pursue my non-traditional marketing ideas, and has even promoted me and added me to the board members (though I suspect some of the older directors may regret it).

This suggests an anomaly. While we benefit from the national advantage of meticulous quality (the strength of peer pressure), we are actively fostering a creative environment by employing and empowering people who fight that pressure.

Therefore, you can expect a lot from us: both the traditional, meticulous Japanese quality you rely on, and the kind of unconventional creativity you usually wouldn’t expect from a traditional Japanese manufacturer.


A corporate logo, the letters of C and H are combined to look like a tree in a circle

Shungo Ijima

He is travelling around the world. His passion is to explain Japan to the world, from the unique viewpoint accumulated through his career: overseas posting, MBA holder, former official of the Ministry of Finance.


Comments

List of comments (6)

TOC